Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biochar combined with DMPP-stabilised ammonium sulphate increased maize biomass yield by up to 14% compared with the sole stabilised fertiliser.

A claim from Co-application of high temperature biochar with 3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate treated ammonium sulphate improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar combined with DMPP-stabilised ammonium sulphate increased maize biomass yield by up to 14% compared with the sole stabilised fertiliser.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of biochar with ammonium sulphate containing DMPPe1
Outcome
maize biomass yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14%e1
Comparator
the sole application of ammonium sulphate containing DMPPe1
Setting
in potse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146
e0

“Maize was grown to maturity on two contrasting soils (acidic Cambisol and neutral Chernozem) in pots with a treatment of biochar co-applied with ammonium sulphate stabilised by a nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate, DMPP) or un-stabilised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–391
e1

“The combination of biochar with ammonium sulphate containing DMPP increased maize biomass yield up to 14%, N uptake up to 34% and NUE up to 13.7% compared to the sole application of ammonium sulphate containing DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–608

Title

Co-application of high temperature biochar with 3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate treated ammonium sulphate improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize

Niguss Solomon Hailegnaw; Filip Mercl; Martin Kulhánek; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85308-0

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-cfd2ae6eb43544fc4563c1b68ed0b00536e364527a469b9042d810ee68078310 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
    First-year maize yields were similar for anticipatory and maize-season ammonium sulphate application under adequate rainfall.

    Ammonium sulphate on maize crops under no tillage · 2012 · compared with complete ammonium sulphate dose application was done in maize seeding and side dressing

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

184 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.