Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NPK treatments significantly increased shoot diameter in both studied years.

A claim from Using of Natural Raw Material Mixture and Magnetite Raw (Magnetic Iron) as Substitute for Chemical Fertilizers in Feeding "Le Conte" Pear Trees Planted in Calcareous Soil · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK treatments significantly increased shoot diameter in both studied years.

Taxon
Pear TreesPyrus communist0
Treatment
NPK treatmentse1
Outcome
shoot diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both studied yearse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pear Trees Planted in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–170
e1

“NPK treatments significantly increased shoot diameter in both studied years and shoot length in the first year only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–806

Title

Using of Natural Raw Material Mixture and Magnetite Raw (Magnetic Iron) as Substitute for Chemical Fertilizers in Feeding "Le Conte" Pear Trees Planted in Calcareous Soil

S.A, Eman; Abd EL-Messeih, W.M.; Mikhael, G.B. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2010. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2010.2301

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-d04f91c464183a68cadf752861df732b6b45e580eb2f9c25b0021ec1ffed5078 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.