Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly reduced weed density to 38.0/m2.

A claim from Effect of sowing date and weed management on productivity and economics of rainfed mungbean (Vigna radiata) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr with hand-weeding significantly reduced weed density to 38.0/m2.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/hae4
Outcome
weed densitye5
Direction
significant reductione5
Value
38.0/m2e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–265
e4

“Application of imazethapyr @ 100 g/ha at 20 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) 1 hand-weeding at 40 DAS resulted in significantly higher plant height, dry matter accumulation, dry matter ef- ficiency, pods/plant, seeds/pod, nodules/plant, nodules dry weight, seed yield (1.17 t/ha), harvest index (29.7%), monetary returns ( 872/ha/day) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–958
e5

“The same treatment also recorded the maximum weed control efficiency (87.9%), which resulted in significant reduction in both weed density (38.0/m2) and weed dry weight (28.6 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1140

Title

Effect of sowing date and weed management on productivity and economics of rainfed mungbean (Vigna radiata)

TIRYAK KUMAR SAMANT; TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i3.4117

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-d0affa231c29537e9214177cb1f88a46241c264b497be7b5db6cb302690c78dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.