Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T12 (NPK-25 g/m² + micronutrients -4 g/L) gave the highest TSS (5.20 °brix) in tomato compared with control.

A claim from Effect of micronutrients on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 (NPK-25 g/m² + micronutrients -4 g/L) gave the highest TSS (5.20 °brix) in tomato compared with control.

Treatment
NPK-25 g/m² + micronutrients -4 g/Le0
Outcome
TSSe3
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.20 °brixe3
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of micronutrients on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89
e0

“The best treatment was T12 (NPK-25 g/m² + micronutrients -4 g/L) which shows highest values in all the parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–475
e2

“thirteen treatment combinations including control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–360
e3

“TSS (5.20 °brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–952

Title

Effect of micronutrients on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Deepak Yadav; Samir E Topno; Vijay Bahadur International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i8i.1340

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-d0ef5b0bffdc271cfb21a1e3716d8ccb670475f55026104a7af5105315110fce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    K fertigation did not change fruit soluble solids concentration.

    Processing Tomato Yield and Fruit Quality Improved with Potassium Fertigation · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Reduced nutrient supply lowered fruit juice soluble solids.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza has limited effects on yield and quality of tomatoes grown under soilless cultivation · 2013

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Nitrogen fertilization reduced dry matter, soluble solids and total sugar index.

    Towards the Optimal Mineral N Fertilization for Improving Peeled Tomato Quality Grown in Southern Italy · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    High fertigation doses reduced redness and soluble solids content.

    Sustainable Transfer of Tomato Landraces to Modern Cropping Systems: The Effects of Environmental Conditions and Management Practices on Long-Shelf-Life Tomatoes · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Increased chloride had no effect on acidity and beta-carotene in tomato fruits.

    The effect of chloride on nutrient contents in fruits of greenhouse Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in rockwool. · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilisation method did not significantly affect titratable acidity, Hg or As.

    The effect of fertilisation with fermented pig slurry on the quantitative and qualitative parameters of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Optical guided fertigation did not influence tomato fruit dry matter content or °Brix.

    Optical Tools, a Suitable Means to Reduce Nitrogen Use in Fertigated Tomato Crop · 2006

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Organic fertilization proportions did not yield significant differences in fruit soluble solids, sugars or pigments.

    Effect of Organic Residues as Fertilizer on Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomatoes · 2021

    Opposite direction

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Micronutrient application raised vitamin C and sugar content.

    Effects of Micronutrients Application to Tomato and Cucumber · 2009

    Same direction

  2. positive
    T7 produced maximum vitamin C content and total soluble solids.

    Good parameters of tomato as influenced by micronutrients and some biofertilizers · 2019 · compared with treatments of micronutrients

    Same direction

  3. positive
    GA 50 ppm with micronutrient mixture produced the highest TSS (5.87 °Brix) in Kashi Aman tomato.

    Effects of growth regulators and micronutrients on the growth, yield and quality of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. Kashi Aman · 2025 · compared with control (T12)

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Full micronutrient rate with potassium humate significantly improved total soluble solids, lycopene, and ascorbic acid in both seasons.

    Fruit quality attributes of tomato affected by application of different levels of potassium humate and micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) · 2020

    Same direction

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.