Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Fruit quality attributes of tomato affected by application of different levels of potassium humate and micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe)

Ashfaq Ahmad Rahi; Saima Nazar; Zahid Hassan Tarar; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Deficiency of micronutrients is a major hurdle to achieve the optimum quality of crop plants fruits in agriculture. These micronutrients are equally important as that of macronutrients. In addition, better availability of micronutrients to the crops played an imperative role in improvement of reproductive growth of plants. Low organic content of arid and semiarid regions is a major factor that significantly decrease the micronutrients phytoavailability and fruit quality. Tomato is one of important crops which is widely consumed as a salad and cooking of food. Similarly, use of humate as an organic soil conditioned is also getting attention of farming community due to its potential benefits. That’s why keeping in mind the importance of organic matter and micronutrients, current experiment was conducted to examine the combine effect of potassium humate and micronutrients variable levels on fruit quality of tomato during summer and winter seasons. It is hypothesized that co-application of potassium and micronutrients application would be efficacious in improvement of tomato fruit quality. Results confirmed that 100% application rate of micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) along with 15 kg ha-1 potassium humate was significantly best regarding an improvement in total soluble solids, lycopene, ascorbic acid and total acidity during summer and winter seasons. It is concluded that micronutrients should be used along with potassium humate to improve the quality of tomato fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full micronutrient rate with potassium humate significantly improved total soluble solids, lycopene, and ascorbic acid in both seasons.

Treatment
100% application rate of micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) along with 15 kg ha-1 potassium humatee0
Outcome
total soluble solids, lycopene, ascorbic acide0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
during summer and winter seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% application rate of micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) along with 15 kg ha-1 potassium humate was significantly best regarding an improvement in total soluble solids, lycopene, ascorbic acid and total acidity during summer and winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit quality attributes of tomato affected by application of different levels of potassium humate and micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full micronutrient rate with potassium humate significantly improved total acidity in both seasons.

Treatment
100% application rate of micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) along with 15 kg ha-1 potassium humatee0
Outcome
total aciditye0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
during summer and winter seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% application rate of micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe) along with 15 kg ha-1 potassium humate was significantly best regarding an improvement in total soluble solids, lycopene, ascorbic acid and total acidity during summer and winter seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruit quality attributes of tomato affected by application of different levels of potassium humate and micronutrients (Zn, B and Fe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend micronutrients with potassium humate to improve tomato fruit quality.

Outcome
micronutrients should be used along with potassium humatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micronutrients should be used along with potassium humate to improve the quality of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1487 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.