Paper · 2024 · Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

The effect of zinc fertilization on yield and quality of commercial processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars

Yahya Nas; İbrahim Duman

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Objective: In this study, conducted in two production seasons, the effects of zinc fertilization on yield and fruit quality of processing tomato varieties (H-1015, Lalin and Kendras) were investigated. Material and Method: Material consisted of ‘H-1015’, ‘Lalin’, and Kendras’ processing tomato varieties. The study consisted of 3 different treatments; zinc applied plots, zinc-free plots and control. Results: The results showed that zinc application to H-1015 and Lalin cultivars gave the highest yield values compared to zinc-free and control treatments in both production seasons. While the differences between the pulp colour values L* and a/b were found to be insignificant in both years, the differences between the values of a* and b* were found to be significant in both years. Similarly, zinc fertilization had no positive effects on the TA and lycopene contents of the varieties. The differences between the fruit pH values of the varieties were found to be significant. While the differences among the Brix values were found to be significant only in 2018, the variety H-1015 showed the highest Brix values in both testing years. Conclusion: Zinc fertilization is proposed to obtain a high yield in processing tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application gave H-1015 the highest yield compared with zinc-free and control treatments in both seasons.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
H-1015e0
Treatment
zinc applicatione0
Outcome
yield valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both production seasonse0
Comparator
zinc-free and control treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application to H-1015 and Lalin cultivars gave the highest yield values compared to zinc-free and control treatments in both production seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application gave Lalin the highest yield compared with zinc-free and control treatments in both seasons.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Laline0
Treatment
zinc applicatione0
Outcome
yield valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both production seasonse0
Comparator
zinc-free and control treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application to H-1015 and Lalin cultivars gave the highest yield values compared to zinc-free and control treatments in both production seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp colour L* and a/b differences were insignificant in both years.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
pulp colour values L* and a/be0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the differences between the pulp colour values L* and a/b were found to be insignificant in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp colour a* and b* differences were significant in both years.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
values of a* and b*e0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the differences between the values of a* and b* were found to be significant in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization had no positive effect on titratable acidity.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
no positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“zinc fertilization had no positive effects on the TA and lycopene contents of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization had no positive effect on lycopene content.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
lycopene contentse0
Direction
no positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“zinc fertilization had no positive effects on the TA and lycopene contents of the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH differed significantly among varieties.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
fruit pH valuese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between the fruit pH values of the varieties were found to be significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brix differed significantly among varieties only in 2018.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Outcome
Brix valuese0
Qualifier
2018e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the differences among the Brix values were found to be significant only in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H-1015 had the highest Brix in both testing years.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
H-1015e0
Outcome
Brix valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both testing yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“the variety H-1015 showed the highest Brix values in both testing years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose zinc fertilization to obtain high processing tomato yield.

Taxon
processing tomatoese0
Outcome
Zinc fertilization is proposed to obtain a high yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilization is proposed to obtain a high yield in processing tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1231 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc atom · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.