zinc atom · Yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
101 claims from these papers; 8 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Optimization of Zinc and Boron Levels for Better Growth and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) (2020)
increaseZinc doses increased tomato flower clusters, fruit dimensions, fruit count and yield up to 4.0 kg ha-1.
The Effects of Seed Inoculation with Bacterial Biofilm on the Growth and Elemental Composition of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivated on a Zinc-Contaminated Substrate (2024)decreaseAdded zinc significantly reduced tomato root and shoot biomass, height, and fruit number.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - TRIALS FOR IMPROVING GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY OF TOMATO (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) PLANTS GROWN IN WINTER SEASON. (2007)
increaseApplication of zinc increased tomato stem and leaf growth traits.
The Effects of Seed Inoculation with Bacterial Biofilm on the Growth and Elemental Composition of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivated on a Zinc-Contaminated Substrate (2024)decreaseAdded zinc significantly reduced tomato root and shoot biomass, height, and fruit number.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - The Effects of Seed Inoculation with Bacterial Biofilm on the Growth and Elemental Composition of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivated on a Zinc-Contaminated Substrate (2024)
decreaseAdded zinc significantly reduced tomato root and shoot biomass, height, and fruit number.
Evaluation of foliar spray of zinc and boron on growth, flowering and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Srijana) under polytunnel in Nepal (2024)increaseChelated zinc at 30 ppm significantly enhanced tomato fruit number to 22.73.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
8 citations between these papers: 8 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 44
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of zinc on yield and quality of tomato · 2003
- positive
- positive
The effects of steel and iron slag zinc fertilizers on fruit yield and quality of tomato · 2008
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Micronutrients Application to Tomato and Cucumber · 2009
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Zn, Fe and their Combination Treatments on the growth and yield of tomato · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effectiveness of soil and foliar applications of zinc and boron on the yield of tomato · 2016
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
The Effects of Zinc Nanofertilizers on Tomato Plants · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Foliar spray of Zn on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production at trans-Himalayan Ladakh region · 2022
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of zinc and boron foliar application on tomato growth and yield under protected structure · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of zinc on qualitative and quantitative traits of major vegetable crops · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.