Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mixed nutrients increased fruits per plant to 42.22.

A claim from Response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to foliar application of micronutrients under low cost protected structure in acidic soil of Meghalaya · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed nutrients increased fruits per plant to 42.22.

Treatment
the foliar feeding of mixture of Ca, B, Zn and Cu (100 ppm each) + Mo (50 ppm) nutrientse0
Outcome
fruits per plante0
Direction
significant increasee0
Value
42.22e0
Comparator
over the treatments having either Ca, B, Zn, Mo, Cu alone or multiplex without calcium as well as controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the significant increase in plant height (162.05 cm), branches per plant (12.27), fruit setting (87.23%), fruits per plant (42.22), fruit weight (75.89 g), yield (76.87 t/ha), shelf life (22.0 days), lycopene content (8.87 mg/100 g) and ascorbic acid (58.06 mg/100 g) under the foliar feeding of mixture of Ca, B, Zn and Cu (100 ppm each) + Mo (50 ppm) nutrients over the treatments having either Ca, B, Zn, Mo, Cu alone or multiplex without calcium as well as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1198
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–41

Title

Response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to foliar application of micronutrients under low cost protected structure in acidic soil of Meghalaya

VEERENDRA KUMAR VERMA; ANJANI KUMAR JHA; B C VERMA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i7.81529

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-82c8bbdf67d73b373e01f371feb7fc54c81785a2d0ad52446617bb3cf0d41288 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

79 papers: 67 positive, 12 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.