Paper · 2025 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Zinc fertilization on zinc dynamics, availability and uptake by tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence in an alfisol

S. Rajendiran; H.B. Raghupathi; B.R. Raghu; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of current investigation is to study direct and residual effects of Zn application on Zn fractions and availability in soil, yield and Zn uptake in tomato - french bean - cucumber system. One year field experiments were conducted during 2018-2019 in soil with DTPA extractable Zn of 0.88 mg kg-1. Treatments were one time soil application of 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg Zn ha-1 through ZnSO4.7H2O as basal dose only to tomato; foliar application of 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O (two times 45 and 60 days after planting in each crop) and control (where Zn fertilization was not done). Crop yield was recorded and DTPA-Zn and Znfractions in soil were analyzed. Soil application of Zn had enhanced soil DTPA-Zn, total Zn content of soil, fruit and dry matter yields, however, beyond 10 kg ha-1 Zn application, significant yield improvement was not recorded. Soil Zn application increased Zn concentration and uptake. Foliar Zn spray did not show any significant change in yield and Zn uptake. Exchangeable-Zn and Zn associated with easily reducible Mn fractions of soil were largely contributed to Zn availability in soil and uptake. Soil application of 10 kg Zn ha-1 yr-1 is recommended in low Zn soils for enhancing productivity of vegetable systems with three crops raised in a year in sequence. However, when soil DTPA-Zn reaches 1.5 mg kg-1, the need based application of Zn to soil can be avoided because no yield response was found beyond this level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Zn enhanced soil DTPA-Zn and total Zn content of soil compared with the control in the tomato-french bean-cucumber sequence.

Treatment
Soil application of Zne2
Outcome
soil DTPA-Zn, total Zn content of soile2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
control (where Zn fertilization was not done)e1
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“One year field experiments were conducted during 2018-2019 in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“and control (where Zn fertilization was not done)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil application of Zn had enhanced soil DTPA-Zn, total Zn content of soil, fruit and dry matter yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of Zn enhanced fruit and dry matter yields compared with the control in the tomato-french bean-cucumber sequence.

Treatment
Soil application of Zne2
Outcome
fruit and dry matter yieldse2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
control (where Zn fertilization was not done)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“and control (where Zn fertilization was not done)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil application of Zn had enhanced soil DTPA-Zn, total Zn content of soil, fruit and dry matter yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application beyond 10 kg ha-1 did not significantly improve yield in the tomato-french bean-cucumber sequence.

Treatment
beyond 10 kg ha-1 Zn applicatione3
Outcome
yield improvemente3
Comparator
10 kg ha-1e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e3

“beyond 10 kg ha-1 Zn application, significant yield improvement was not recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn application increased Zn concentration and uptake compared with the control in the tomato-french bean-cucumber sequence.

Treatment
Soil Zn applicatione4
Outcome
Zn concentration and uptakee4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
control (where Zn fertilization was not done)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“and control (where Zn fertilization was not done)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–575 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil Zn application increased Zn concentration and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn spray did not significantly change yield or Zn uptake in the tomato-french bean-cucumber sequence.

Treatment
foliar application of 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2Oe6
Outcome
yield and Zn uptakee5
Direction
did not show any significant changee5
Comparator
control (where Zn fertilization was not done)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“and control (where Zn fertilization was not done)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–575 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar Zn spray did not show any significant change in yield and Zn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–981 · show in text ↑
e6

“foliar application of 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–470 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable Zn and Zn associated with easily reducible Mn fractions of soil largely contributed to soil Zn availability and uptake in the tomato sequence.

Compound
Exchangeable-Zne7
Outcome
Zn availability in soil and uptakee7
Qualifier
Zn associated with easily reducible Mn fractionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“Exchangeable-Zn and Zn associated with easily reducible Mn fractions of soil were largely contributed to Zn availability in soil and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of 10 kg Zn ha-1 yr-1 is recommended in low Zn soils for enhancing productivity of vegetable systems with three crops a year.

Treatment
Soil application of 10 kg Zn ha-1 yr-1e1
Outcome
productivity of vegetable systemse1
Setting
low Zn soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil application of 10 kg Zn ha-1 yr-1 is recommended in low Zn soils for enhancing productivity of vegetable systems with three crops raised in a year in sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1287 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Need-based soil Zn application can be avoided when soil DTPA-Zn reaches 1.5 mg kg-1, because no yield response was found beyond this level.

Outcome
need based application of Zn to soil can be avoidede1
Value
1.5 mg kg-1e1
Qualifier
when soil DTPA-Zn reaches 1.5 mg kg-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato-french bean-cucumber cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“when soil DTPA-Zn reaches 1.5 mg kg-1, the need based application of Zn to soil can be avoided because no yield response was found beyond this level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1446 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

296 papers: 261 positive, 35 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 296 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.