zinc atom · Yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)
58 claims from these papers; 14 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Response of Transplanted Oilseed Rape to Zinc Placement and Root Pruning (2004)
increaseBanding of Zn increased final seed yield by an average of 10% in two field experiments.
Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Yield and Quality of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) (2012)no changeB and Zn had no significant effect on yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Winter Oilseed Rape Productivity and Nutritional Quality Responses to Zinc Fertilization (2014)
increaseZn application increased oilseed rape seed yield by 5.0 to 16.0%.
Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Yield and Quality of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) (2012)no changeB and Zn had no significant effect on yield.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
14 citations between these papers: 14 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 35
Characteristic of uptake of boron and zinc and their application methods in rape · 1995
- positive
Zinc and phosphorus responses in transplanted oilseed rape (Brassica napus) · 1996
- positive
- positive
Zinc and phosphorus responses in transplanted oilseed rape (Brassica nupus) · 1996
- positive
Study on Combined Application of Zn and B to Rape · 2003
- positive
- positive
Response of Transplanted Oilseed Rape to Zinc Placement and Root Pruning · 2004
- positive
- positive
Effects of B,Mo,Zn interaction on the seed yield and quality of Brassica napus · 2007
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Leaf Application of B and Zn Compound Micro-fertilizer on Quality and Yield of Rap · 2009
- positive
Effects of B, Mo, Zn, and Their Interactions on Seed Yield of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) · 2009
- positive
- positive
Effects of application of Se,Zn on the seed yield and quality of Brassica napus · 2010
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Winter Oilseed Rape Productivity and Nutritional Quality Responses to Zinc Fertilization · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of micronutrients on seed yield and oil content of Brassica napus L. cv. Talayeh · 2015
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
The effects of different methods of zinc application on canola seed yield and oil content · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Sulfur, Boron, Zinc and Iron on Canola under Salt Affected Soils · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Response of rapeseed varieties (Brassica napus L.) to foliar application of zinc · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Foliar Application of Biostimulants Alleviates Water Stress in Canola ( Brassica napus L.) · 2025
- positive
- positive
The role of microelement preparations in the formation of spring rape productivity · 2026
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
- no effect
Physiological Response to Zinc Pollution of Rape (Brassica chinensis l) in Paddy Soil Ecosystem · 2011
- negative
Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Yield and Quality of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) · 2012
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.