Paper · 2024 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Improving Canola (Brassica napus L.) Seed Yield through Micronutrients Sprays: Effects on Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Defense under Different Irrigation Regimes

S. A. Kalantar Ahmadi; J. Daneshian

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Drought stress is a major limited factor that decreased seed yield and applying micronutrients such as Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn) and Boron (B) is considered as agricultural management practices for improving the seed yield, oil content and tolerance under different irrigation conditions. A two-year experiment was carried out as a split-plot arrangement based on a randomized complete block design with three replications during two years (2015–2017). Main plots consisted of three irrigation regimes (Optimal irrigation, cessation of irrigation from flowering, and silique setting stages) and subplots included 10 levels of foliar spray of micronutrients (2, 4, 6 g/L Zn; 2, 4, 6 g/L Mn; 2, 4, 6 g/L B, and the foliar spraying of distilled water as control treatment). Cessation of irrigation led to increase in the activity of Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (PO), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Proline (PRO) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) but seed yield (SY) and oil content (OC) decreased. Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages led to a decrease in seed yield by 39.3 and 13.1%, as compared with the optimal irrigation regime, respectively. The interaction of irrigation regime × foliar spray revealed that spraying Zn (4 g/L) and B (4 g/L) maximized the SY (4311.11 kg/ha) under optimal irrigation regime. Under cessation of irrigation from flowering stage, the foliar spray of Mn (6 g/L) produced the highest SY (2862.2 kg/ha) during two tears. Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages caused in decrease OC by 3.3 and 6.5%, respectively. Overall, the foliar spraying of Zn, Mn and B improved the SY and OC of canola under optimal water supply and drought stress regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cessation of irrigation increased the activity of polyphenol oxidase, catalase and peroxidase in canola.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cessation of irrigatione1
Outcome
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (PO)e1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cessation of irrigation led to increase in the activity of Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (PO), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Proline (PRO) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) but seed yield (SY) and oil content (OC) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cessation of irrigation increased ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and proline activity in canola.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cessation of irrigatione1
Outcome
Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Proline (PRO)e1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cessation of irrigation led to increase in the activity of Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (PO), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Proline (PRO) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) but seed yield (SY) and oil content (OC) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cessation of irrigation increased malondialdehyde in canola.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cessation of irrigatione1
Outcome
Malondialdehyde (MDA)e1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cessation of irrigation led to increase in the activity of Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), Catalase (CAT), Peroxidase (PO), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Proline (PRO) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) but seed yield (SY) and oil content (OC) decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages decreased canola seed yield by 39.3 and 13.1%.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stagese2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
39.3 and 13.1%e2
Comparator
optimal irrigation regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages led to a decrease in seed yield by 39.3 and 13.1%, as compared with the optimal irrigation regime, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages decreased canola oil content by 3.3 and 6.5%.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stagese3
Outcome
OCe3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
3.3 and 6.5%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cessation of irrigation at flowering and silique stages caused in decrease OC by 3.3 and 6.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Zn (4 g/L) and B (4 g/L) maximized canola seed yield under optimal irrigation.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
spraying Zn (4 g/L) and B (4 g/L)e4
Outcome
SYe4
Direction
maximizede4
Value
4311.11 kg/hae4
Qualifier
under optimal irrigation regimee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“spraying Zn (4 g/L) and B (4 g/L) maximized the SY (4311.11 kg/ha) under optimal irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of Mn (6 g/L) gave the highest canola seed yield under cessation of irrigation from flowering.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
foliar spray of Mn (6 g/L)e5
Outcome
SYe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
2862.2 kg/hae5
Qualifier
Under cessation of irrigation from flowering stagee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under cessation of irrigation from flowering stage, the foliar spray of Mn (6 g/L) produced the highest SY (2862.2 kg/ha) during two tears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of Zn, Mn and B improved canola seed yield and oil content under optimal and drought regimes.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
foliar spraying of Zn, Mn and Be6
Outcome
SY and OCe6
Direction
improvede6
Qualifier
under optimal water supply and drought stress regimese6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, the foliar spraying of Zn, Mn and B improved the SY and OC of canola under optimal water supply and drought stress regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1761 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 29 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

stage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 24 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

application · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 85 positive, 8 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.