Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

FOLIAR SPRAY EXPERIMENTS IDENTIFY NO BORON DEFICIENCY BUT MOLYBDENUM AND MANGANESE DEFICIENCY FOR CANOLA GRAIN PRODUCTION ON ACIDIFIED SANDY GRAVEL SOILS IN SOUTHWESTERN AUSTRALIA

R. F. Brennan; M. D. A. Bolland

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Since the early 1990s canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.) has become a major crop species grown on the predominantly sandy soils of southwestern Australia. Numerous studies have been undertaken to determine the fertilizer requirements of the crop in the region. This paper reports results of a field experiment conducted at three sites on typical acidified (pH [Ca] ∼4.6) sandy gravel soils to identify if molybdenum (Mo), manganese (Mn) or boron (B) were deficient for canola grain production. Different levels of each element, separately or as mixtures, were applied as foliar sprays at mid-flowering. Maximum grain yield responses of ∼11–20% to applied Mo, as sodium molybdate (39% Mo), were obtained when 40 g Mo/ha was applied. Maximum grain yield responses of ∼13–28% to applied Mn were achieved by applying 1000 g ha−1 Mn, as manganese sulfate (24% Mn). A mixture of 40 g Mo ha−1 and 1000 g Mn ha−1 increased grain yields by ∼15–38%. Boron, applied as borax (11% B), sprayed individually or in combination with Mo or/and Mn, had no effect on grain yields. None of the foliar spray treatments had any effect on oil concentration in canola grain. The sprays did not cause any visible damage to foliage. Soil acidification has been shown to induce Mo deficiency for cereal crops in the region and both soil acidification and induced Mo deficiency are alleviated by applying sufficient lime to raise pH of top 10 cm soil to 5.5 or greater, and this strategy should also apply to canola. Further research is required to determine the fertilizer Mn requirements for canola grain production in the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mo at 40 g Mo/ha produced maximum canola grain yield responses of about 11–20%.

Treatment
40 g Mo/hae0
Outcome
grain yield responsese0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
∼11–20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield responses of ∼11–20% to applied Mo, as sodium molybdate (39% Mo), were obtained when 40 g Mo/ha was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mn at 1000 g ha−1 gave maximum grain yield responses of about 13–28%.

Treatment
1000 g ha−1 Mne0
Outcome
grain yield responsese0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
∼13–28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum grain yield responses of ∼13–28% to applied Mn were achieved by applying 1000 g ha−1 Mn, as manganese sulfate (24% Mn).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Mo and Mn increased canola grain yields by about 15–38%.

Treatment
A mixture of 40 g Mo ha−1 and 1000 g Mn ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
∼15–38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mixture of 40 g Mo ha−1 and 1000 g Mn ha−1 increased grain yields by ∼15–38%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron alone or with Mo or Mn had no effect on canola grain yield.

Treatment
Boron, applied as borax (11% B)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boron, applied as borax (11% B), sprayed individually or in combination with Mo or/and Mn, had no effect on grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray treatments did not affect canola grain oil concentration.

Treatment
foliar spray treatmentse0
Outcome
oil concentration in canola graine0
Direction
had any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the foliar spray treatments had any effect on oil concentration in canola grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays caused no visible foliage damage.

Outcome
did not cause any visible damage to foliagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sprays did not cause any visible damage to foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend liming acidified soil to topsoil pH 5.5 or greater for canola.

Outcome
applying sufficient lime to raise pH of top 10 cm soil to 5.5 or greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this strategy should also apply to canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying sufficient lime to raise pH of top 10 cm soil to 5.5 or greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1446 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

borax · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.