Paper · 1970 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Evaluation of Application Methods Efficiency of Zinc and Iron for Canola(Brassica napus L.)

Ahmad BYBORDI; Garib MAMEDOV

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
69
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to evaluation of application method efficiency of zinc and iron microelements in canola, an experiment was conducted in the Agricultural Research Station of Eastern Azerbaijan province in 2008. The experimental design was a RCBD with eight treatments (F1: control, F2: iron, F3: zinc, F4: iron + zinc in the form of soil utility, F5: iron, F6: zinc, F7: iron+ zinc in the form of solution foliar application, and F8: iron + zinc in the form of soil utility and foliar application). Analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences among treatments on given traits, antioxidant enzymes activity, fatty acids percentage, plant height, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio, protein percentage, oil percentage, oil yield, 1000 seed weight, seed yield, nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium percentage of leaves, zinc and iron content of leaves and capitulum diameters. The highest seed yield, oil yield, oil percentage, 1000 seed weight, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and protein percentage were obtained from the soil and foliar application of iron + zinc treatments (F8). Also, the highest amounts of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium concentration in leaves were achieved from control treatment which was an indication of non-efficiency of iron and zinc on the absorption rate of these substances in the leaves. The correlation between effective traits on the seed yield, such as, capitalism diameter, number of seed rows in capitulum, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and 1000 seed weight were positively significant. In general, foliar and soil application of zinc and iron had the highest efficiency in aspect of seed production. The comparison of the various methods of fertilization showed that foliar application was more effective than soil application. Also, micronutrient foliar application increased concentration of elements, especially zinc and iron. Antioxidant enzymes activity was different in response to treatments also the highest palmitoleic, oleic and myristic acid were observed in F6 and F7 treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application of iron + zinc (F8) gave the highest seed yield, oil yield and oil percentage in canola.

Treatment
soil and foliar application of iron + zince0
Outcome
seed yield, oil yield, oil percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield, oil yield, oil percentage, 1000 seed weight, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and protein percentage were obtained from the soil and foliar application of iron + zinc treatments (F8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application of iron + zinc (F8) gave the highest 1000 seed weight, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and protein percentage in canola.

Treatment
soil and foliar application of iron + zince0
Outcome
1000 seed weight, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and protein percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield, oil yield, oil percentage, 1000 seed weight, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and protein percentage were obtained from the soil and foliar application of iron + zinc treatments (F8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium concentrations in canola leaves were obtained from the control treatment, indicating non-efficiency of iron and zinc on their absorption.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest amounts of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium concentration in leaves were achieved from control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola seed yield correlated positively and significantly with capitulum diameter, number of seed rows in capitulum, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and 1000 seed weight.

Organ / stage
capitulume0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation between effective traits on the seed yield, such as, capitalism diameter, number of seed rows in capitulum, seed weight to capitulum weight ratio and 1000 seed weight were positively significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of zinc and iron was more effective than soil application for canola seed production.

Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
soil applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application was more effective than soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient foliar application increased the concentration of elements in canola, especially zinc and iron.

Treatment
micronutrient foliar applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of elementse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
especially zinc and irone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“micronutrient foliar application increased concentration of elements, especially zinc and iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzymes activity in canola differed in response to the fertilization treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Antioxidant enzymes activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzymes activity was different in response to treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest palmitoleic, oleic and myristic acid levels in canola were observed in the F6 and F7 (foliar iron or zinc) treatments.

Treatment
F6 and F7 treatmentse0
Outcome
palmitoleic, oleic and myristic acide0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest palmitoleic, oleic and myristic acid were observed in F6 and F7 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–2064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis of variance showed significant differences among treatments on the measured traits in canola.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
given traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences among treatments on given traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola(Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

micronutrient · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.