Paper · 2022 · Romanian Agricultural Research

Effects of Silicon and Zinc Sources on Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Canola at Normal and Late Planting Dates

Mehrali Shahmardan; Elyas Rahimi Petroudi; Alireza Daneshmand; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to study the effects of silicon (Si) and zinc (Zn) sources on yield components, seed yield, seed oil content and nutrient concentrations in canola grain at normal and late planting dates, a field experiment was conducted as a split plot-factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Ghaemshahr Agricultural Research Station during the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons. Planting dates as the main plot at two levels (normal planting date, late planting date), silicon fertilizer sources at three levels (control, calcium silicate, nano-Si) and zinc fertilizer sources at three levels (control, zinc sulfate, nano-Zn) were considered as sub-plots. The results showed that all the agronomical and physiological traits studied improved in the normal planting date, while delay in planting date led to a significant reduction in the traits. Application of Si and Zn by both nanoparticles (NPs) and conventional forms significantly increased the yield components, seed yield, seed oil content and nutrient uptake in grain compared to the control plants. There was no significant difference between application of nano-Si and calcium silicate in terms of rapeseed yield and quality. The nano-Zn treated plants showed both higher seed yield and higher nutrient uptake, when compared to zinc sulfate treated plants. The combined application of Si with Zn, especially in the form of nanoparticles resulted in higher seed oil content than the application of Si or Zn alone. In general, the application of Si and Zn in the form of nanoparticles at normal planting date is a promising option to increasing seed yield and improving nutrient uptake in rapeseed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting significantly reduced studied agronomic and physiological traits.

Treatment
delay in planting datee0
Outcome
agronomical and physiological traitse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
normal planting datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that all the agronomical and physiological traits studied improved in the normal planting date, while delay in planting date led to a significant reduction in the traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and zinc nanoparticles and conventional forms increased yield components and seed yield against controls.

Treatment
Si and Zn by both nanoparticles (NPs) and conventional formse0
Outcome
yield components, seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Si and Zn by both nanoparticles (NPs) and conventional forms significantly increased the yield components, seed yield, seed oil content and nutrient uptake in grain compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and zinc applications increased seed oil content and nutrient uptake in grain.

Treatment
Si and Zn by both nanoparticles (NPs) and conventional formse0
Outcome
seed oil content and nutrient uptake in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Si and Zn by both nanoparticles (NPs) and conventional forms significantly increased the yield components, seed yield, seed oil content and nutrient uptake in grain compared to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Si and calcium silicate did not significantly differ in rapeseed yield and quality.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
nano-Sie0
Outcome
rapeseed yield and qualitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
calcium silicatee0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between application of nano-Si and calcium silicate in terms of rapeseed yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Zn produced higher seed yield than zinc sulfate.

Treatment
nano-Zne0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
zinc sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nano-Zn treated plants showed both higher seed yield and higher nutrient uptake, when compared to zinc sulfate treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Zn produced higher nutrient uptake than zinc sulfate.

Treatment
nano-Zne0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
zinc sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nano-Zn treated plants showed both higher seed yield and higher nutrient uptake, when compared to zinc sulfate treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined silicon and zinc, especially as nanoparticles, increased seed oil content over either alone.

Treatment
combined application of Si with Zne0
Outcome
seed oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
especially in the form of nanoparticlese0
Comparator
application of Si or Zn alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of Si with Zn, especially in the form of nanoparticles resulted in higher seed oil content than the application of Si or Zn alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nanoparticle silicon and zinc at normal planting for yield and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
application of Si and Zn in the form of nanoparticles at normal planting datee0
Outcome
increasing seed yield and improving nutrient uptakee0

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the application of Si and Zn in the form of nanoparticles at normal planting date is a promising option to increasing seed yield and improving nutrient uptake in rapeseed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1691 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

zinc atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

silicon atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.