Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar nano fertilizer with conventional fertilizer significantly improved growth, yield and quality.

A claim from Potential of Foliar Applied Nano Fertilizer in Improving the Growth, Yield and Quality of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano fertilizer with conventional fertilizer significantly improved growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napuse0
Treatment
foliar application of nano fertilizer in combination with conventional fertilizere0
Outcome
growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano fertilizer in combination with conventional fertilizer significantly improved the growth, yield and quality of Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1181

Title

Potential of Foliar Applied Nano Fertilizer in Improving the Growth, Yield and Quality of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)

Sushma Konjengbam; Sandeep Menon International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2024. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i64701

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e1174b33799870320177f4e02af80c34eb952e886111ce4891a3753cd2accfa1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.