Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Potential of Foliar Applied Nano Fertilizer in Improving the Growth, Yield and Quality of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)

Sushma Konjengbam; Sandeep Menon

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the Research farm of the School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Punjab to find out the potential of foliar-applied nano fertilizer in improving the growth, yield and quality of Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with four replications. The experiment consisted of five treatments viz. T1: Control, T2: 50% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS, T3: 75% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS, T4: 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS and T5: 125% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS. The application of 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DAS (T4) recorded the highest plant height (184.75 cm), seed yield (22.80 q ha-1) and stover yield (49 q ha-1). More oil (43.32%) and protein (31.73%) content were also recorded in T4 as compared to other treatments. The overall results showed that foliar application of nano fertilizer in combination with conventional fertilizer significantly improved the growth, yield and quality of Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest plant height of 184.75 cm.

Taxon
Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napust0
Treatment
100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DASe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
184.75 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DAS (T4) recorded the highest plant height (184.75 cm), seed yield (22.80 q ha-1) and stover yield (49 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest seed yield of 22.80 q ha-1.

Taxon
Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napust0
Treatment
100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.80 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DAS (T4) recorded the highest plant height (184.75 cm), seed yield (22.80 q ha-1) and stover yield (49 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest stover yield of 49 q ha-1.

Taxon
Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napust0
Treatment
100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DASe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
49 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as a foliar spray at 30 DAS (T4) recorded the highest plant height (184.75 cm), seed yield (22.80 q ha-1) and stover yield (49 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had more oil content, 43.32%, than other treatments.

Taxon
Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napust0
Treatment
T4: 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DASe1
Outcome
oile0
Direction
Moree0
Value
43.32%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More oil (43.32%) and protein (31.73%) content were also recorded in T4 as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“T4: 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had more protein content, 31.73%, than other treatments.

Taxon
Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napust0
Treatment
T4: 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DASe1
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
Moree0
Value
31.73%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More oil (43.32%) and protein (31.73%) content were also recorded in T4 as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“T4: 100% RDF + Nano NPK (19:19:19) @ 0.2% as foliar spray at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano fertilizer with conventional fertilizer significantly improved growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus)Brassica napuse0
Treatment
foliar application of nano fertilizer in combination with conventional fertilizere0
Outcome
growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano fertilizer in combination with conventional fertilizer significantly improved the growth, yield and quality of Gobhi sarson (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1181 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.