Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Enhancement of Lodging Resistance and Lignin Content by Application of Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization in Brassica napus L.

Yue Hu; Hafiz Hassan Javed; Muhammad Ahsan Asghar; et al.

15
claims
41
verbatim quotes
43
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of organic carbon and silicon fertilizers on the lodging resistance, yield, and economic performance of rapeseed. Two cultivars, namely Jayou (lodging-resistant) and Chuannongyou (lodging-susceptible), were selected to evaluate the effects of various fertilizer treatments on rapeseed culm morphology, lignin accumulation, and their relationships with their lodging resistance indices. The results showed that both organic carbon and silicon fertilizer applications increased the plant height, basal stem diameter, internode plumpness, and bending strength of rapeseed in both the studied years. The bending strength was significantly and positively correlated with the lodging resistance index and lignin content. It was found that both organic carbon and silicon fertilizers had improved the activities of lignin biosynthesis enzymes (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and peroxiredoxins) and their related genes to increase lignin accumulation in the culm, which ultimately improved the lodging resistance. At the same time, the thickness of the stem cortex, vascular bundle area, and xylem area was increased, and the stem strength was improved. The effect of silicon fertilizer was better than that of organic carbon fertilizer, but there was no significant difference with the mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizer. Similarly, silicon fertilizer increased the number of pods, significantly increased the yield, and improved the economic benefit, while organic carbon fertilizer had no significant effect on the yield. Therefore, we believe that organic carbon and silicon fertilizer can improve the lodging resistance of rape stems by improving the lignin accumulation and the mechanical tissue structure. Still, the effect of silicon fertilizer is the best. Considering the economic benefits, adding silicon fertilizer can obtain more net income than the mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fertilizers increased plant height, basal stem diameter and internode plumpness in both years.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
organic carbon and silicon fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
plant height, basal stem diameter, internode plumpnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the studied yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both organic carbon and silicon fertilizer applications increased the plant height, basal stem diameter, internode plumpness, and bending strength of rapeseed in both the studied years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fertilizers increased rapeseed bending strength in both years.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
organic carbon and silicon fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
bending strengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both organic carbon and silicon fertilizer applications increased the plant height, basal stem diameter, internode plumpness, and bending strength of rapeseed in both the studied years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–642 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bending strength was positively correlated with lodging resistance index.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Outcome
lodging resistance indexe0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
bending strengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bending strength was significantly and positively correlated with the lodging resistance index and lignin content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bending strength was positively correlated with lignin content.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Outcome
lignin contente0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
bending strengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bending strength was significantly and positively correlated with the lodging resistance index and lignin content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fertilizers improved lignin biosynthesis enzyme activities and related genes.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
organic carbon and silicon fertilizerse0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and peroxiredoxinse0
Outcome
activities of lignin biosynthesis enzymese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both organic carbon and silicon fertilizers had improved the activities of lignin biosynthesis enzymes (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and peroxiredoxins) and their related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fertilizers increased lignin accumulation in the culm.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
culme0
Treatment
organic carbon and silicon fertilizerse0
Outcome
lignin accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both organic carbon and silicon fertilizers had improved the activities of lignin biosynthesis enzymes (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and peroxiredoxins) and their related genes to increase lignin accumulation in the culm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatment increased stem cortex thickness, vascular bundle area and xylem area.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilizationt1
Outcome
thickness of the stem cortex, vascular bundle area, and xylem areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the thickness of the stem cortex, vascular bundle area, and xylem area was increased, and the stem strength was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatment improved stem strength.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Outcome
stem strengthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the thickness of the stem cortex, vascular bundle area, and xylem area was increased, and the stem strength was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer performed better than organic carbon fertilizer for lodging resistance.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
organic carbon fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of silicon fertilizer was better than that of organic carbon fertilizer, but there was no significant difference with the mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer and mixed fertilizer application did not differ significantly.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference with the mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer increased pod number.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicon fertilizer increased the number of pods, significantly increased the yield, and improved the economic benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer significantly increased yield.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicon fertilizer increased the number of pods, significantly increased the yield, and improved the economic benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer improved economic benefit.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicon fertilizer increased the number of pods, significantly increased the yield, and improved the economic benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon fertilizer had no significant yield effect.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
organic carbon fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon fertilizer had no significant effect on the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilizer produced more net income than mixed silicon and organic carbon fertilizer.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
silicon fertilizere0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding silicon fertilizer can obtain more net income than the mixed application of silicon fertilizer and organic carbon fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–132 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Carbon and Silicon Fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–111 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.