Paper · 2023 · Plants

Controlled-Release Nitrogen Mixed with Common Nitrogen Fertilizer Can Maintain High Yield of Rapeseed and Improve Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency

Yue Hu; Fangfang Zhang; Hafiz Hassan Javed; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different proportions of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with quick-acting nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of direct-seeding rapeseed. Using a conventional nitrogen application rate of 180 kg ha−1 as a control, a total of 5 types of available nitrogen fertilizers and different proportions of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers were mixed for fertilizer treatment. The proportion of available nitrogen fertilizer used was 135 kg ha−1, and the addition ratios of the five types of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers were 0%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100%, respectively (i.e., the proportion of controlled-release nitrogen to the total nitrogen application amount). These ratios were represented as N135R0, N135R1, N135R2, N135R3, and N135R4, respectively. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, or the grain yield under the treatment of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with quick-acting nitrogen fertilizer for proportions of 30–50% (N135R1~R3) when compared with the control, and a stable yield was achieved. Mixing controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer under reduced nitrogen application can significantly improve the apparent utilization rate of rapeseed nitrogen fertilizer, but it first increases and then decreases with the increase of the controlled-release nitrogen mixing ratio, reaching its highest under the N135R2 treatment. The agronomic utilization efficiency and partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer first increased and then decreased with the increased proportion of controlled-release nitrogen, and both reached their highest utilization with the N135R2 treatment. The mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogen did not affect soil urease activity, but significantly increased soil sucrase activity. The mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogen also increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon content. Especially in the flowering stage, the soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon content was significantly higher under a controlled-release nitrogen mixing ratio of 30–50%. At the same time, it had a similar effect on soil inorganic nitrogen content. Therefore, a controlled-release nitrogen mixing treatment provided sufficient nitrogen for the key growth period of rapeseed. Under the condition of reducing the amount of nitrogen fertilizer by 25% based on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied to conventional rapeseed, the application of controlled-release urea mixed with common nitrogen fertilizer mixed at a ratio of 30–50% can be an effective way to maintain grain yield levels and improve nitrogen utilization efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed nitrogen fertilizer at 30–50% maintained pod number, seed number and grain yield relative to conventional nitrogen.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with quick-acting nitrogen fertilizer for proportions of 30–50%e0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, or the grain yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, or the grain yield under the treatment of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer mixed with quick-acting nitrogen fertilizer for proportions of 30–50% (N135R1~R3) when compared with the control, and a stable yield was achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced nitrogen with controlled release fertilizer significantly improved apparent nitrogen utilization, peaking at N135R2.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
Mixing controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer under reduced nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
apparent utilization rate of rapeseed nitrogen fertilizere0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
highest under the N135R2 treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer under reduced nitrogen application can significantly improve the apparent utilization rate of rapeseed nitrogen fertilizer, but it first increases and then decreases with the increase of the controlled-release nitrogen mixing ratio, reaching its highest under the N135R2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1542 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic nitrogen utilization efficiency peaked at N135R2 after increasing then decreasing with mixing ratio.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Outcome
agronomic utilization efficiencye0
Direction
increased and then decreasede0
Qualifier
highest utilization with the N135R2 treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic utilization efficiency and partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer first increased and then decreased with the increased proportion of controlled-release nitrogen, and both reached their highest utilization with the N135R2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer partial productivity peaked at N135R2 after increasing then decreasing with mixing ratio.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Outcome
partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizere0
Direction
increased and then decreasede0
Qualifier
highest utilization with the N135R2 treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic utilization efficiency and partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer first increased and then decreased with the increased proportion of controlled-release nitrogen, and both reached their highest utilization with the N135R2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed controlled-release nitrogen did not affect soil urease activity.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogene0
Outcome
soil urease activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogen did not affect soil urease activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed controlled-release nitrogen significantly increased soil sucrase activity.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogene0
Outcome
soil sucrase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogen did not affect soil urease activity, but significantly increased soil sucrase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed controlled-release nitrogen increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogene0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed treatment of controlled-release nitrogen also increased soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, 30–50% controlled-release nitrogen significantly increased soil microbial nitrogen and carbon.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
controlled-release nitrogen mixing ratio of 30–50%e0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Especially in the flowering stage, the soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon content was significantly higher under a controlled-release nitrogen mixing ratio of 30–50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release nitrogen had a similar effect on soil inorganic nitrogen content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
controlled-release nitrogent0
Outcome
soil inorganic nitrogen contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At the same time, it had a similar effect on soil inorganic nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2228–2304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Controlled-Release Nitrogen Mixed with Common Nitrogen Fertilizer Can Maintain High Yield of Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded mixed controlled-release nitrogen supplied sufficient nitrogen during key rapeseed growth.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
controlled-release nitrogen mixing treatmente0
Outcome
sufficient nitrogene0
Qualifier
key growth periode0

Verbatim

e0

“a controlled-release nitrogen mixing treatment provided sufficient nitrogen for the key growth period of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2317–2430 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 30–50% controlled-release urea with common fertilizer at 25% lower total nitrogen to maintain yield and improve use efficiency.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Outcome
application of controlled-release urea mixed with common nitrogen fertilizer mixed at a ratio of 30–50%e0
Qualifier
reducing the amount of nitrogen fertilizer by 25%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of reducing the amount of nitrogen fertilizer by 25% based on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied to conventional rapeseed, the application of controlled-release urea mixed with common nitrogen fertilizer mixed at a ratio of 30–50% can be an effective way to maintain grain yield levels and improve nitrogen utilization efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2432–2788 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.