Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under drought stress, foliar selenium significantly increased seed oil yield.

A claim from Effect of the Application of Foliar Selenium on Canola Cultivars as Influenced by Different Irrigation Regimes · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, foliar selenium significantly increased seed oil yield.

Treatment
foliar seleniume0
Outcome
seed oil yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
Under drought stress conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress conditions, foliar selenium caused a significant increase in seed yield, seed oil yield, and the relative water content of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–843
t0

“canola”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 48–54

Title

Effect of the Application of Foliar Selenium on Canola Cultivars as Influenced by Different Irrigation Regimes

Mandana Hemmati; Babak Delkhosh; Amir hossein Shirani rad; et al. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 2019. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.424899

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2eccc91c74144a8835995d24bca95605c40901be5fef77414bd0d35f49eeb244 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

selenium atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.