Paper · 2025 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Synergistic effects of magnesium and zinc supplementation on yield performance and oil quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) in reclaimed soil environments

Elsayed Sh. Alwakel; Abdelsalam A. Shehab; Sobhi F. Lamlom; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Canola ( Brassica napus L.) is an important oilseed crop with notable economic and nutritional value; however, its productivity in newly reclaimed soils is hindered by nutrient deficiencies and complex soil conditions. This study examined the combined effects of magnesium (Mg) fertilisation and zinc (Zn) foliar applications on the growth, yield and oil quality of canola in newly reclaimed soils in Egypt during the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 growing seasons. A split-plot experimental design was utilised, featuring Mg rates (12, 24, 48 and 72 kg/ha) as main plots and Zn foliar applications (0, 3, 5 and 6 g/L) as sub-plots. The results indicated significant improvements in plant growth characteristics, yield components and oil parameters with elevated levels of Mg and Zn. The treatment combination of 72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zn consistently improved plant height, number of primary branches, siliques per plant and 1000-seed weight in both seasons. Seed yield increased by 71%, achieving 3.50 t/ha, while oil yield exhibited a 134.9% rise, reaching 1,377.43 kg/ha. Principal component analysis revealed that the increased application of Mg and Zn significantly enhanced agronomic performance, with the first two principal components accounting for 90.7% of the total variance. Correlation and path analyses revealed intricate interactions among traits, with the number of siliques per plant and oil content demonstrating the most significant direct effects on seed and oil yields. This study highlights the significance of balanced nutrient management for optimising canola productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mg and Zn improved plant height in both seasons.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zne0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of 72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zn consistently improved plant height, number of primary branches, siliques per plant and 1000-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mg and Zn improved number of primary branches in both seasons.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zne0
Outcome
number of primary branchese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of 72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zn consistently improved plant height, number of primary branches, siliques per plant and 1000-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mg and Zn improved siliques per plant in both seasons.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zne0
Outcome
siliques per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of 72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zn consistently improved plant height, number of primary branches, siliques per plant and 1000-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mg and Zn improved 1000-seed weight in both seasons.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Treatment
72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zne0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of 72 kg Mg/ha and 6 g/L Zn consistently improved plant height, number of primary branches, siliques per plant and 1000-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield rose by 71%.

Treatment
magnesium and zinc supplementationt0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield increased by 71%, achieving 3.50 t/ha, while oil yield exhibited a 134.9% rise, reaching 1,377.43 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Synergistic effects of magnesium and zinc supplementation on yield performance and oil quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) in reclaimed soil environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

oil yield rose by 134.9%.

Treatment
magnesium and zinc supplementationt0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
risee0
Value
134.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield increased by 71%, achieving 3.50 t/ha, while oil yield exhibited a 134.9% rise, reaching 1,377.43 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Synergistic effects of magnesium and zinc supplementation on yield performance and oil quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) in reclaimed soil environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first two principal components accounted for 90.7% of variance.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Outcome
total variancee0
Value
90.7%e0
Setting
principal componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first two principal components accounting for 90.7% of the total variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

number of siliques per plant had a strong direct effect on seed and oil yields.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
number of siliques per plante0
Outcome
seed and oil yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of siliques per plant and oil content demonstrating the most significant direct effects on seed and oil yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

oil content had a strong direct effect on seed and oil yields.

Taxon
canola (Brassica napus L.)Brassica napust0
Organ / stage
oil contente0
Outcome
seed and oil yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of siliques per plant and oil content demonstrating the most significant direct effects on seed and oil yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

magnesium atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.