Paper · 2021 · Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology

Effect of Organic Residues as Fertilizer on Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomatoes

Patrícia Lígia Dantas de Morais; Ana Kaline da Costa Ferreira; Maísa de Macêdo Cruz; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Composting of domestic residues to replace cattle manure was evaluated as a fertilization option for the cherry tomato crop. Two sources of organic compounds (CO) were used to prepare compost piles: Domestic residues (DR) and bovine manure (BM), used in 5 proportions (CO1 = 15% DR + 15% BM, CO2 = 10% DR + 20% BM, CO3 = 20% DR + 10% BM, CO4 = 30% BM (control) and CO5 = 30% DR). To compost the compost piles, the organic waste (carbon source) was mixed with remnants of tree pruning (filler) from the urban cleaning service in a ratio of 1: 3. After 90 days, the compost from each matured pile was mixed with 1: 1 coconut fiber substrate and filled into 15 L plastic bags where the cherry tomato plants were grown. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using the experimental design of randomized blocks with 5 treatments and 5 replicates (6 fruits per sample). The organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residue did not provide statistically significant differences in soluble solids, total sugars, lycopene, carotene and micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and P in cherry tomato fruits. Fertilization with CO1 and CO2 increased AT, Mn and decreased the SS / AT, K and Ca ratio. There was no nutritional deficiency of tomatoes in any of the proportions of the organic residues studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization proportions did not yield significant differences in fruit soluble solids, sugars or pigments.

Treatment
organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residuee0
Outcome
soluble solids, total sugars, lycopene, carotenee0
Direction
did not provide statistically significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residue did not provide statistically significant differences in soluble solids, total sugars, lycopene, carotene and micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and P in cherry tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization proportions did not yield significant differences in fruit micronutrients.

Treatment
organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residuee0
Outcome
micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and Pe0
Direction
did not provide statistically significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residue did not provide statistically significant differences in soluble solids, total sugars, lycopene, carotene and micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and P in cherry tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO1 fertilization increased AT and Mn.

Treatment
CO1e0
Outcome
AT, Mne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with CO1 and CO2 increased AT, Mn and decreased the SS / AT, K and Ca ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cherry Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization increased AT and Mn.

Treatment
CO2e0
Outcome
AT, Mne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with CO1 and CO2 increased AT, Mn and decreased the SS / AT, K and Ca ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cherry Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO1 fertilization decreased the SS/AT ratio, K and Ca.

Treatment
CO1e0
Outcome
SS / AT, K and Ca ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with CO1 and CO2 increased AT, Mn and decreased the SS / AT, K and Ca ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cherry Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 fertilization decreased the SS/AT ratio, K and Ca.

Treatment
CO2e0
Outcome
SS / AT, K and Ca ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with CO1 and CO2 increased AT, Mn and decreased the SS / AT, K and Ca ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cherry Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No organic-residue proportion caused tomato nutritional deficiency.

Outcome
no nutritional deficiencye0
Qualifier
in any of the proportions of the organic residues studiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no nutritional deficiency of tomatoes in any of the proportions of the organic residues studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1304 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.