Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organic fertilization proportions did not yield significant differences in fruit micronutrients.

A claim from Effect of Organic Residues as Fertilizer on Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomatoes · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization proportions did not yield significant differences in fruit micronutrients.

Treatment
organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residuee0
Outcome
micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and Pe0
Direction
did not provide statistically significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic fertilization in the proportions of manure and food residue did not provide statistically significant differences in soluble solids, total sugars, lycopene, carotene and micronutrients Zn, Fe, N and P in cherry tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1106

Title

Effect of Organic Residues as Fertilizer on Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomatoes

Patrícia Lígia Dantas de Morais; Ana Kaline da Costa Ferreira; Maísa de Macêdo Cruz; et al. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2021. doi:10.1590/1678-4324-2021200071

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e2cc77afda9647b0682db42a7e7c6c8f906160b03c195cced03f2586d85f32df · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

118 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.