Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SRI yields reached 9.68 tons/ha in the dry season compared with CF.

A claim from Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI yields reached 9.68 tons/ha in the dry season compared with CF.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.68 tons/hae0
Qualifier
dry seasone0
Comparator
CFe0
Setting
Tanzaniat0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the dry season, the SRI and 80% SRI produced higher yields of 9.68 tons/ha and 11.45 tons/ha and saved 26% and 35% of water, respectively compared to the CF (8.69 tons/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–941
t0

“Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82

Title

Water Use and Rice Productivity for Irrigation Management Alternatives in Tanzania

Stanslaus Materu; Sanjay Shukla; Rajendra Sishodia; et al. Water 2018. doi:10.3390/w10081018

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-d1a93e4ced5d5aecae5bc7cb4fb127e6b0413a4cc0d53d046784f585ff11aa96 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,162 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.