Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Plants on low magnesium showed macroscopical vein yellowing compared with high magnesium.

A claim from Brief note: Differences in intracellular localization of corn stunt spiroplasmas in magnesium treated maize. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants on low magnesium showed macroscopical vein yellowing compared with high magnesium.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
low magnesium treatmente2
Outcome
vein yellowinge2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Comparator
high magnesium treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants infected with Spiroplasma kunkelii show symptoms similar to that of plants in a magnesium-deficient soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117
e1

“Plants grown on a high magnesium treatment showed no macroscopical alterations nor organelle ultrastructural alterations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–554
e2

“plants on a low magnesium treatment showed macroscopical vein yellowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–633

Title

Brief note: Differences in intracellular localization of corn stunt spiroplasmas in magnesium treated maize.

CLAUDIA NOME; PAULO CÉSAR MAGALHÃES; ELIZABETH OLIVEIRA; et al. Biocell 2009. doi:10.32604/biocell.2009.33.133

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d1f228a784f424ebfb518538561ebe3adfeb8188b51832f7cccc8451d493d861 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

magnesium atom · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.