Paper · 1958 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Magnesium Deficiency and Corn Yield on Two Acid Indiana Soils

C. D. Foy; S. A. Barber

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted on two acid, sandy loam soils of northern Indiana (Newton, pH 4.7 and Tracy, pH 4.8) to determine the influence of magnesium, calcitic lime, and potash on yields, magnesium deficiency symptoms, and leaf composition of corn. Treatments included factorial combinations of 100 and 500 pounds K 2 O, 0 and 72 pounds Mg (as MgSO 4 · 7 H 2 O), and 0 and 6 tons of calcitic bag lime per acre. On the Newton soil both potash treatments induced widespread magnesium deficiency symptoms. Their identity was confirmed by low magnesium and high potassium contents of leaves. The occurrence of magnesium deficiency symptoms was not accompanied by a reduction in corn yield. Magnesium additions essentially prevented development of the symptoms, significantly increased the percentage of magnesium, and decreased the percentage of potassium in leaves, but did not affect yields. On the Newton soil calcitic lime produced significant yield increases, but did not significantly affect K‐induced magnesium deficiency symptoms nor percentage of magnesium in the leaves. On the Tracy soil only a few plants showed magnesium deficiencies, and none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yields. The evidence indicates that yield‐limiting magnesium deficiency symptoms with corn are not likely to result from the use of calcitic lime and potash in amounts presently recommended on these soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both potash treatments induced widespread magnesium deficiency symptoms on Newton soil.

Treatment
both potash treatmentse0
Outcome
magnesium deficiency symptomse0
Direction
inducede0
Setting
Newton soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Newton soil both potash treatments induced widespread magnesium deficiency symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficient leaves had low magnesium and high potassium contents.

Outcome
low magnesium and high potassium contents of leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their identity was confirmed by low magnesium and high potassium contents of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium deficiency symptoms did not accompany reduced corn yield.

Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
not accompanied by a reductione0
Qualifier
magnesium deficiency symptomse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The occurrence of magnesium deficiency symptoms was not accompanied by a reduction in corn yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium additions prevented deficiency symptoms.

Treatment
Magnesium additionse0
Outcome
development of the symptomse0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium additions essentially prevented development of the symptoms, significantly increased the percentage of magnesium, and decreased the percentage of potassium in leaves, but did not affect yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium additions increased leaf magnesium percentage significantly.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Magnesium additionse0
Outcome
percentage of magnesiume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium additions essentially prevented development of the symptoms, significantly increased the percentage of magnesium, and decreased the percentage of potassium in leaves, but did not affect yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium additions decreased leaf potassium percentage.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Magnesium additionse0
Outcome
percentage of potassiume0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium additions essentially prevented development of the symptoms, significantly increased the percentage of magnesium, and decreased the percentage of potassium in leaves, but did not affect yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium additions did not affect yields.

Treatment
Magnesium additionse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium additions essentially prevented development of the symptoms, significantly increased the percentage of magnesium, and decreased the percentage of potassium in leaves, but did not affect yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcitic lime significantly increased yield on Newton soil.

Treatment
calcitic limee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
Newton soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Newton soil calcitic lime produced significant yield increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcitic lime did not significantly affect potassium-induced magnesium deficiency symptoms on Newton soil.

Treatment
calcitic limee0
Outcome
K‐induced magnesium deficiency symptomse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Setting
Newton soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Newton soil calcitic lime produced significant yield increases, but did not significantly affect K‐induced magnesium deficiency symptoms nor percentage of magnesium in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcitic lime did not significantly affect leaf magnesium percentage on Newton soil.

Treatment
calcitic limee0
Outcome
percentage of magnesium in the leavese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Setting
Newton soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Newton soil calcitic lime produced significant yield increases, but did not significantly affect K‐induced magnesium deficiency symptoms nor percentage of magnesium in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only a few Tracy-soil corn plants showed magnesium deficiencies.

Outcome
magnesium deficienciese0
Setting
Tracy soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Tracy soil only a few plants showed magnesium deficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash did not significantly affect corn yield on Tracy soil.

Treatment
potashe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime did not significantly affect corn yield on Tracy soil.

Treatment
limee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium treatment did not significantly affect corn yield on Tracy soil.

Treatment
magnesium treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the potash, lime, or magnesium treatments significantly affected yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended calcitic lime and potash amounts are unlikely to cause yield-limiting magnesium deficiency on these soils.

Outcome
yield‐limiting magnesium deficiency symptomse0
Qualifier
not likelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The evidence indicates that yield‐limiting magnesium deficiency symptoms with corn are not likely to result from the use of calcitic lime and potash in amounts presently recommended on these soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1443 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

magnesium atom · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 19 positive, 9 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

lime · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

potassium · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 291 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.