Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Band spacing had no effect on wheat protein content.

A claim from Effect of band spacing on wheat protein yield and marginal effect analysis. · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Band spacing had no effect on wheat protein content.

Treatment
band spacinge0
Outcome
PCe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“band spacing took hadlsingificant effect on the wheat PY and GY, but no effect on the PC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–314

Title

Effect of band spacing on wheat protein yield and marginal effect analysis.

Lin Li Shengtaixue zazhi 2003

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d24d7ccd03aa61720645a79c8b5de5b8c09b26be521e989da091e03faf9be229 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 19 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Lower seeding rates increased flour protein content by 15 mg g −1.

    Seeding Rate and Genotype Effect on Agronomic Performance and End‐Use Quality of Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Grain protein concentration rose from 13.1% to 13.9% with the higher seed rate.

    Water Use by No‐Till Winter Wheat Influence of Seed Rate and Row Spacing · 1991 · compared with 35 kg ha −1 seeding rate

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Protein content of wheat at 30-inch spacing was 3.2 per cent higher than at 6-inch spacing.

    THE EFFECT OF VARYING ROW SPACINGS ON THE AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF CEREALS AND FLAX · 1963 · compared with 6-inch spacing

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Wider rows met the minimum 11.5% grain crude protein requirement for bread-making wheat.

    Effects of organic wheat cultivation in wider rows on grain yield and quality. · 2008

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Drill sowing at 18 cm raised wheat growth rate and grain, biological and protein yields versus other techniques.

    Weed Studies and Productivity of Wheat under Various Planting Techniques and Weed Management Practices · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    A seed rate of 111 kg ha−1 with a weed-free period up to 75 DAS enhanced test weight and grain protein content of wheat.

    Enhancing wheat yield and quality through optimized weed control timing and seeding density · 2025

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Protein, wet gluten and sedimentation of wheat grain improved with planting density.

    Effect of the Ultra-high Planting Density of Wheat Variety Yumai 49-198 on Its Grain Yield and Quality · 2008

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Zhoumai 22 had higher grain protein under equal spacing.

    Effects of row spacing patterns on grain filling characteristics and starch and protein accumulation in grains of high-yielding winter wheat. · 2010

    Opposite direction

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.