Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly between the fungicide combination treatments.

A claim from Study on the STOP effect of fungicide combinations to control late blight in potato. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly between the fungicide combination treatments.

Treatment
fungicide combinationst0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
different treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fungicide combinations to control late blight in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–83
e0

“No significant differences in yield were observed for the different treatments applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–749

Title

Study on the STOP effect of fungicide combinations to control late blight in potato.

Betty Heremans; Geert Haesaert Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d2e5e49e466ecc9574a8e665c29c01b800e58a5d3b5dec11282d5eba0c361dc5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Fungicide treatment increased potato yield by 20.6 to 24.0% in four of five autumn and winter experiments.

    Effects of Growing Season and Fungicide Type on the Development ofAlternaria solaniand on Potato Yield · 1996 · compared with nontreated plots

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
    Integrated host resistance and fungicide application gave yield gains of more than 30% compared with the untreated control.

    Effect of Integrating Planting Time, Fungicide Application and Host Resistance on Potato Late Blight Development in South‐western Uganda · 2002 · compared with untreated control

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Fungicide spraying gave a mean yield advantage of 62% over unsprayed plots.

    Effect of Varieties and Fungicides on Potato Late Blight (Phytophthora infestans, (Mont.) de Bary) Management · 2018 · compared with unsprayed ones

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Fungicide and antioxidant effects were additive in increasing tuber weight.

    Effect of Ozone, Antioxidant Protection, and Early Blight on Potato in the Field1 · 1982

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Fungicide programs yielded 0 to +118.5% more than unsprayed controls, mean +30.2%.

    The effect of phenylamide fungicides on the control of potato late‐blight ( Phytophthora infestans ) in England and Wales from 1978 to 1992 · 1996 · compared with unsprayed controls

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Specialty fungicide programs increased potato tuber yields by 4% over standard fungicides.

    Quantifying Control Efficacy of Fungicides Commonly Applied for Potato Early Blight Management · 2019 · compared with standard fungicides

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Fungicide applications increased potato tuber yields.

    Influence of rate and frequency of Ridomil plus applications on late blight severity and potato yields in Cameroon · 2001

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Curzate significantly increased tuber yield relative to control.

    Effect of systemic and contact fungicides on late blight disease and tuber yield of potato. · 2014 · compared with control

    No difference from an alternative

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.