Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 25 % DASM improved economic returns.

A claim from Optimising irrigation and conservation tillage for enhanced wheat yield and profitability in Eastern India · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 25 % DASM improved economic returns.

Treatment
Irrigation at 25 % depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) (I1)e0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 25 % depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) (I1) consistently improved yield characteristics and economic returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–666
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65

Title

Optimising irrigation and conservation tillage for enhanced wheat yield and profitability in Eastern India

P Shruti; M K Singh; K Birendra; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.10768

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d34b743381e4b6c69457b6955bb5d6a84ea980a8fc2242cdade11b931cb0e9a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.