Claim · model-written summary
The alfalfa stand was reduced only by 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae3 - Treatment
- 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosatee3
- Outcome
- alfalfa stande3
- Direction
- reducede3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“alfalfa response was evaluated when chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, 2,4-D, glyphosate, bromoxynil, and selected combinations of those herbicides were applied at rates simulating spray drift during the fourth trifoliolate leaf stage following the first cutting in 1990 and 1991”
e3“The alfalfa stand was reduced only by 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate”
Title
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift
Kassim Al-Khatib; Robert Parker; E. Patrick Fuerst Weed Technology 1992. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00036538
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Observation The phytotoxicity order of the tested herbicides on alfalfa was 2,4-D > chlorsulfuron > thifensulfuron > glyphosate > bromoxynil.
- Intervention effect By season end, alfalfa had recovered from injury caused by all herbicides except the highest rates of 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate.
- Intervention effect All herbicides caused characteristic symptoms on alfalfa.