Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No damage was found in rice at the 11.2 kg As/ha rate with the midseason draining and drying treatment.

A claim from Residual Effects of MSMA on Sterility in Rice Cultivars1 · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No damage was found in rice at the 11.2 kg As/ha rate with the midseason draining and drying treatment.

Treatment
midseason draining and drying treatmente4
Outcome
damagee4
Qualifier
at this arsenic (As) ratee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“sterility in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars grown on Crowley silt loam soil (Typic Albaqualf) amended with monosodium methanearsonate (MSMA) increased as cultivar susceptibility to straight‐head increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–246
e4

“No damage was found at this arsenic (As) rate for the midseason draining and drying treatment, a common straighthead control practice, or for either water management at the 1.1 kg As/ha rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1108

Title

Residual Effects of MSMA on Sterility in Rice Cultivars1

J. T. Gilmour; B. R. Wells Agronomy Journal 1980. doi:10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200060049x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d363d369cf596bb462e74c36b691b0bb30b00d0c0b3aedd032cf420068f7a07c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

processing · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.