Paper · 1999 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Control of gundhi bug in upland rice

H. P. Misra

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were carried out to find out a suitable control measure against the gundhi bug, Leptocorisa oratorius Fabr. (Coreidae : Homoptera), a serious pest of upland paddy. Two insecticides viz., malathion and phosphamidon; two neem products viz., multineem and RD-9 repelin, and fermented snails were field evaluated for their efficacy against the bug. Fermented snails as a bait controlled the gundhi bugs effectively as envisaged from the lowest post treatment population, per cent grain damage (8.37%) and highest grain yield (2279 Kg/ha) of paddy cv. Parijat. However, neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in gundhi bug population control, per cent grain damage (8.75%) and grain yield (2139 Kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented snails as a bait lowered the post-treatment population of gundhi bugs.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Fermented snails as a baite1
Interactor
gundhi bugse1pest
Outcome
post treatment populatione1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fermented snails as a bait controlled the gundhi bugs effectively as envisaged from the lowest post treatment population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented snails as a bait reduced per cent grain damage by gundhi bug to 8.37%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
Fermented snails as a baite1
Interactor
gundhi bugse1pest
Outcome
per cent grain damagee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
8.37%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fermented snails as a bait controlled the gundhi bugs effectively as envisaged from the lowest post treatment population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest post treatment population, per cent grain damage (8.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented snails as a bait gave the highest grain yield of paddy cv. Parijat, 2279 Kg/ha.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Material
paddy cv. Parijate3
Treatment
Fermented snails as a baite1
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2279 Kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fermented snails as a bait controlled the gundhi bugs effectively as envisaged from the lowest post treatment population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“highest grain yield (2279 Kg/ha) of paddy cv. Parijat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in gundhi bug population control.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
neem product multineeme4
Interactor
gundhi buge4pest
Outcome
gundhi bug population controle4
Direction
at pare4
Comparator
fermented snailse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in gundhi bug population control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in per cent grain damage, 8.75%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
neem product multineeme4
Interactor
gundhi buge4pest
Outcome
per cent grain damagee5
Direction
at pare4
Value
8.75%e5
Comparator
fermented snailse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in gundhi bug population control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–661 · show in text ↑
e5

“per cent grain damage (8.75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in grain yield, 2139 Kg/ha.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
neem product multineeme4
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
at pare4
Value
2139 Kg/hae6
Comparator
fermented snailse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Control of gundhi bug in upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“neem product multineem was at par with fermented snails in gundhi bug population control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–661 · show in text ↑
e6

“grain yield (2139 Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–721 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

processing · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.