Claim · model-written summary
NT soybean yield was 24% less than tilled soybean yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- NT treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Soybean yielde0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 24%e0
- Comparator
- tilled treatmente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean yield was 24% less in the NT treatments than the tilled treatment”
t0“soybean”
Title
Emily R. Bernstein; Joshua L. Posner; David E. Stoltenberg; et al. Agronomy Journal 2011. doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0498
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Soybean establishment did not differ between tilled and NT treatments.
- Intervention effect NT rye treatments posed minimal risk of a drier soil profile.
- Intervention effect Rye mulch reduced weed biomass by 75% relative to tillage.
- Intervention effect NT soybean competed with rye regrowth.
- Intervention effect NT soybean were deficient in Cu.
- Intervention effect NT soybean accumulated 22% as much dry matter as tilled soybean.
- Intervention effect NT soybean accumulated 28% as much N as tilled soybean.
- Intervention effect Row width and planting date affected NT soybean productivity.
- Intervention effect Row width and planting date did not affect profitability.
- Intervention effect NT profitability per hectare was 27% less than tillage.
- Intervention effect NT profitability per hour was 25% greater than tillage.
- Intervention effect Predicted soil erosion was nearly 90% less in NT rye systems.