Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphorus did not significantly affect plant height or the number of pods per plant at 70 and 85 DAS.

A claim from Effect of Spacing and Different Levels of Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus did not significantly affect plant height or the number of pods per plant at 70 and 85 DAS.

Material
Malepatan‐1t0
Treatment
Pe1
Outcome
plant height or number of pods per plant at 70 and 85 DASe1
Direction
did not significantly impacte1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–163
e1

“P did not significantly impact plant height or number of pods per plant at 70 and 85 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–741

Title

Effect of Spacing and Different Levels of Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal

Biraj Poudel; Gaurab Chaudhary; Archana Bhatt; et al. Advances in Agriculture 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/9394237

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-d472d3593db4bbd24bda23682b4d49e389d8facd4b9196496fb01c1e82e59284 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.