Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pod length at 85 DAS was highest at the 60 kg/ha P level, 20.33 cm.

A claim from Effect of Spacing and Different Levels of Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod length at 85 DAS was highest at the 60 kg/ha P level, 20.33 cm.

Material
Malepatan‐1t0
Treatment
60 kg/ha P levele1
Outcome
pod lengthe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
20.33e1
Qualifier
at 85 and 100 DASe1
Setting
Dang District, Nepalt0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–163
e1

“The highest fresh pod yield (1.05 t/ha) and pod length at 85 and 100 DAS (20.33 and 21.16 cm, respectively) were observed at 60 kg/ha P level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–884

Title

Effect of Spacing and Different Levels of Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Malepatan‐1 Variety of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal

Biraj Poudel; Gaurab Chaudhary; Archana Bhatt; et al. Advances in Agriculture 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/9394237

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e1f189279d2861133d4019a97c5cf3925e3bf606d7a9a138ba882b629e007209 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.