Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sids 12 under I1 had the lowest kernels per spike and grain yield in the second season.

A claim from Evaluation of Four New Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars in Sandy Soils under Different Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates for Yield and Its Components · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sids 12 under I1 had the lowest kernels per spike and grain yield in the second season.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Material
Sids 12e0
Treatment
I1 irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
number of kernels/spike and grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sids 12 gave the lowest number of kernels/spike and grain yield under I1 irrigation treatment in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2116–2230
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–56

Title

Evaluation of Four New Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars in Sandy Soils under Different Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates for Yield and Its Components

Hassan Abd El-kreem 2013

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-d490aa34976e6a214fd25a40827d8ed8599e3600151b25b3041cba2e5546b7ab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.