Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Enriched organics increased available soil N and P2O5.

A claim from Effect of Fe and Zn enriched organics on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by summer groundnut · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched organics increased available soil N and P2O5.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Fe or Zn enriched organics (FYM or vermicompost) treatmentse0
Outcome
available N and P2O5 content in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The available N and P2O5 content in soil were significantly increased under Fe or Zn enriched organics (FYM or vermicompost) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1446
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95

Title

Effect of Fe and Zn enriched organics on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by summer groundnut

Vishal C Damor; JM Patel; PP Chaudhary International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d4d2c2a3a59f62e9551b81960c0cefacbe2d9f1aacb540c0eef34b37090423f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

iron atom · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 47 positive, 4 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.