Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After 25 days, plants used half of the applied nitrogen from chemical or commercial micro-organic fertilizer, twice that from composts.

A claim from Evaluation of compost quality through germination index, plant yield and nitrogen use efficiency on Japanese Watercress (Nasturtium officinale) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 25 days, plants used half of the applied nitrogen from chemical or commercial micro-organic fertilizer, twice that from composts.

Taxon
Japanese Watercress (Nasturtium officinale)Nasturtium officinalet0
Treatment
chemical fertilizer or commercial micro-organic fertilizere0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
twice as manye0
Value
half of the total Ne0
Qualifier
After 25 dayse0
Comparator
two compostse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 25 days of fertilizer application, the plants used half of the total N from chemical fertilizer or commercial micro-organic fertilizer, which was twice as many as those from two composts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1504
t0

“Japanese Watercress (Nasturtium officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–143

Title

Evaluation of compost quality through germination index, plant yield and nitrogen use efficiency on Japanese Watercress (Nasturtium officinale)

Toan D. Tran; Luan A. Ha; Ngan T. Long; et al. The Journal of Agriculture and Development 2022. doi:10.52997/jad.7.01.2022

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d4ef767ca41d1899fea7351f961f0ad0986d847cf56ec0b927101f02d6f08eba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Nasturtium officinale (watercress)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.