Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed management significantly increased maize growth parameters over the weedy check.

A claim from Effect of Weed and Nutrient management on Growth, Productivity and Protein content of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management significantly increased maize growth parameters over the weedy check.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Weed management measurese0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, LAIe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
different stages of crop growthe0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management measures during experimentation resulted in significant increase in all growth parameters (plant height, dry matter accumulation, LAI, RGR and NAR) compared to weedy check at different stages of crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–806
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107

Title

Effect of Weed and Nutrient management on Growth, Productivity and Protein content of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.)

Parvati Deewan; SL Mundra; Dilip Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d5ef54e90c8edab195a345e7baab92f3e1942c4018e4abcf36368a48f7f4af19 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

642 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.