Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Diclofop methyl gave the largest wheat yield increases.

A claim from CONTROL OF WILD OATS IN WHEAT WITH BARBAN, DICLOFOP METHYL, FLAMPROP METHYL AND DIFENZOQUAT · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop methyl gave the largest wheat yield increases.

Treatment
Diclofop methyle0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclofop methyl consistently caused the greatest reduction in wild oat culms and plant weights and resulted in the largest wheat yield increases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–418
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29
t1

“WILD OATS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–20

Title

CONTROL OF WILD OATS IN WHEAT WITH BARBAN, DICLOFOP METHYL, FLAMPROP METHYL AND DIFENZOQUAT

K. J. KIRKLAND; P. A. O’SULLIVAN Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1984. doi:10.4141/cjps84-139

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d63fdd95ac5ddd983eab96c0677c5d43fef51f61a5c9b476b184ed97120b4c0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

diclofop-methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Diclofopmethyl produced significantly less wheat grain yield than sulfosulfuron at 25, 30, and 45 g ha−1.

    Effect of Doses and Stages of Application of Sulfosulfuron on Weeds and Wheat Yield · 2002 · compared with sulfosulfuron at 25, 30 and 45 g ha−1

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Tank mixing diclofopmethyl with tralkoxydim lowered yields.

    Efficacy of Isoproturon, Diclofop-methyl and Tralkoxydim Alone or in Mixture against Weeds in Wheat · 1999

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Diclofopmethyl gave the lowest net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

    Efficacy of herbicides applied alone and in tank mixture with isoproturon against wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) and broad-leaf weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Diclofopmethyl had the lowest net returns and benefit to cost ratio.

    Efficacy of herbicides applied alone and in tank mixture with isoproturon against wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) and broad leaf weeds in wheat (T ticum aestivum) · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Diclofop methyl and tralkoxidim gave similar yield to the new herbicides in the first year.

    Bioefficacy of New Herbicides for the Control of Resistant Phalaris minor in Wheat · 1999 · compared with new herbicides

    No difference from an alternative

  6. no effect
    Wheat grain yield under diclofop-methyl was at par with isoproturon.

    Bio-efficacy of Herbicides against Isoproturon Resistant Biotypes of Phalaris minor in Wheat · 2003 · compared with isoproturon

    No difference from an alternative

  7. no effect
    Grain yields under all three post-emergence herbicides were at par with the recommended isoproturon treatment.

    Performance of New Herbicides for Controlling Wild Canary Grass (Phalaris minor) in Wheat · 1997 · compared with the recommended herbicide treatment (Isoproturon)

    No difference from an alternative

  8. no effect
    Diclofop-methyl grain yield was at par with isoproturon.

    INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND DICLOFOP-METHYL ON WEED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) · 2007 · compared with isoproturon at 1.0 kg/ha

    No difference from an alternative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.