Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Green fertilization minimized the depletion of exchangeable cations and was thought to prevent cassava yield losses.

A claim from Green manure, a sustainable strategy to improve soil quality: a case study in an oxisol from northern Brazil · 2023

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green fertilization minimized the depletion of exchangeable cations and was thought to prevent cassava yield losses.

Treatment
green fertilizatione7
Outcome
depletion of exchangeable cationse7
Direction
minimizinge7
Qualifier
thereby preventing yield lossese7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is an easy to manage crop with good tolerance to drought and low-fertility soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115
e7

“green fertilization positively influences SOC, minimizing the depletion of exchangeable cations and thereby preventing yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1318

Title

Green manure, a sustainable strategy to improve soil quality: a case study in an oxisol from northern Brazil

Marcelo Laranjeira Pimentel; Iolanda Maria Soares Reis; Maria Lita Padinha Corrêa Romano; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2023. doi:10.21475/ajcs.23.17.06.p3832

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d64d2c48bba7ab08f2e57ae343d470ba813f0e4a09afef6f93cff9b9ff1e6aa2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.