fertilization · Molecular: metabolites · Manihot esculenta (cassava)
21 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of different processing methods on cyanide content of garri from four cultivars of cassava (2007)
increaseFertilizer increased cyanide content in fried product across all four cultivars.
Characterization of a popular cassava product obtained from fertilizer treatednew and conventional cassava varieties towards achieving zero hunger (2022)decreaseFertilizer treatment level significantly reduced cyanide in gari from both varieties.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 11
- positive
Study of variability and similarities among Lotus corniculatus L. accessions. · 2010
- positive
Effects of bioorganic fertilizer and lime on physiological characteristics and growth of cassava · 2011
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
Cassava nutritive characteristics of NPK and effect of fertilizer application · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Integrated omics analysis on organic fertilizer-mediated regulation of starch synthesis in cassava · 2026
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 6
- negative
- no effect
Effect of different processing methods on cyanide content of garri from four cultivars of cassava · 2007
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.