Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Potassium Nutrition and Translocation in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Intercropped with Soybean

S. Umeh; C. Onyeonagu; B. Umeh

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiment to investigate the effect of potassium nutrition and translocation in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) intercropped with soybean (Glycine max (L) Merril) was conducted at University of Nigeria, Nsukka in a derived savannah location of South Eastern Nigeria. The Effect of application of potassium fertilizer on two varieties of cassava intercropped with six cultivars of soybean was studied. Cassava tuber yield was significantly (P<0.05) affected by their varieties, fertilizer rate and cropping system. An increase in the supply of K + by fertilization (N 0 K 50 and N 45 K 50 ) increased K + accumulation in source leaves and caused increase in cassava tuber yield. The highest tuber yield of 42.0 t ha -1 was obtained with NR 8230 cassava variety intercropped with soybeans cultivars TGX 1894-3E with the application of N 0 K 50, followed by NR 8230 intercropped with Samsoy-2 with N 45 K 50 (40.5 t ha -1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava tuber yield varied significantly with variety, fertilizer rate and cropping system.

Material
varietiese0
Treatment
fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Qualifier
cropping systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava tuber yield was significantly (P<0.05) affected by their varieties, fertilizer rate and cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization increased potassium accumulation in cassava source leaves.

Organ / stage
source leavese0
Treatment
fertilization (N 0 K 50 and N 45 K 50 )e0
Outcome
K + accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the supply of K + by fertilization (N 0 K 50 and N 45 K 50 ) increased K + accumulation in source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization increased cassava tuber yield.

Treatment
fertilization (N 0 K 50 and N 45 K 50 )e0
Outcome
cassava tuber yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the supply of K + by fertilization (N 0 K 50 and N 45 K 50 ) increased K + accumulation in source leaves and caused increase in cassava tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR 8230 cassava intercropped with TGX 1894-3E soybean under N 0 K 50 had the highest tuber yield, 42.0 t ha -1.

Material
NR 8230e0
Treatment
N 0 K 50e0
Interactor
soybeansGlycine maxe0other
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.0 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
TGX 1894-3Ee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest tuber yield of 42.0 t ha -1 was obtained with NR 8230 cassava variety intercropped with soybeans cultivars TGX 1894-3E with the application of N 0 K 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NR 8230 cassava intercropped with Samsoy-2 soybean under N 45 K 50 yielded 40.5 t ha -1, ranking second.

Material
NR 8230e0
Treatment
N 45 K 50e0
Interactor
SoybeanGlycine maxt0other
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Value
40.5 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
Samsoy-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by NR 8230 intercropped with Samsoy-2 with N 45 K 50 (40.5 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cassava tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Intercropped with Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–101 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.