Intervention effectmodel-written summary

First year soybean after corn had greater seed weight than annually alternated soybean.

A claim from Tillage, Rotation Sequence, and Cultivar Influences on Brown Stem Rot and Soybean Yield · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First year soybean after corn had greater seed weight than annually alternated soybean.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
First‐year soybean following 5 yr of corne0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4.8%e0
Comparator
soybean annually alternated with corne0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First‐year soybean following 5 yr of corn had 44% less severity of BSR, 11% greater yield, and 4.8% greater seed weight than soybean annually alternated with corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1231
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–81

Title

Tillage, Rotation Sequence, and Cultivar Influences on Brown Stem Rot and Soybean Yield

E. A. Adee; E. S. Oplinger; C. R. Grau jpa 1994. doi:10.2134/jpa1994.0341

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-d6684e7beaef06ca9c568dab6b2069975a9bed0e0edaa31468d3889d237a7296 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.