Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Copper treatment alone did not change proline, hydrogen peroxide or abscisic acid level in maize relative to controls

A claim from Investigation of Comparative Regulation on Antioxidant Enzyme System under Copper Treatment and Drought Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper treatment alone did not change proline, hydrogen peroxide or abscisic acid level in maize relative to controls

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Copper treatments alonee1
Outcome
proline, hydrogen peroxide content and abscisic acid levele1
Direction
did not changee1
Comparator
control groupse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–133
e1

“Copper treatments alone did not change stomatal conductance, relative water content, malondialdehyde, proline, hydrogen peroxide content and abscisic acid level according to control groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–543

Title

Investigation of Comparative Regulation on Antioxidant Enzyme System under Copper Treatment and Drought Stress in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Hatice CETİNKYA; Burcu SECKIN DINLER; Eda TASCI Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2014. doi:10.15835/nbha.42.2.9632

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d6e50a6ef8e466f6f0c5d4131eb3e5fcad7781a7d513b73ef965581a205c9be4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

copper atom · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.