Mechanismmodel-written summary

The authors judged photoinhibitory feedback unlikely to explain the Rubisco capacity limit at high latitudes.

A claim from Field analysis of photoprotection in co‐occurring cool climateC3andC4grasses · 2012

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged photoinhibitory feedback unlikely to explain the Rubisco capacity limit at high latitudes.

Taxon
Spartina pectinataSporobolus michauxianuse1
Outcome
C(4) success at high latitudese0
Qualifier
it is unlikely via a photoinhibitory feedback mechanisme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus michauxianus
Sporobolus michauxianus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low Rubisco capacity of C(4) species is a potential limiting factor to C(4) success at high latitudes, but our findings suggest that it is unlikely via a photoinhibitory feedback mechanism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1410
t0

“grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76
e1

“Spartina pectinata (C(4) ) and Calamogrostis canadensis (C(3) )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–595

Title

Field analysis of photoprotection in co‐occurring cool climateC3andC4grasses

Philip‐Edouard Shay; David S Kubien Physiologia Plantarum 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01662.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-d8fcbfa8582d135094f4c5466244a79b9973b9dfe4cd50a65d92e35a14a61eac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer