Claim · model-written summary
The two grasses had similar chronic photoinhibition susceptibility, except possibly at spring emergence.
- Taxon
- Spartina pectinata
Sporobolus michauxianuse1 - Outcome
- susceptibility to chronic photoinhibitione0
- Direction
- no differentiale0
- Qualifier
- except potentially during spring emergencee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no differential susceptibility to chronic photoinhibition (i.e. photodamage) between the C(3) and C(4) species, except potentially during spring emergence”
t0“grasses”
e1“Spartina pectinata (C(4) ) and Calamogrostis canadensis (C(3) )”
Title
Field analysis of photoprotection in co‐occurring cool climateC3andC4grasses
Philip‐Edouard Shay; David S Kubien Physiologia Plantarum 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01662.x
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation C. canadensis had higher protective dynamic photoinhibition across the growing season.
- Observation S. pectinata had greater Φ(NPQ) during temperature minima.
- Observation S. pectinata had lower EPS during temperature minima.
- Mechanism The authors judged photoinhibitory feedback unlikely to explain the Rubisco capacity limit at high latitudes.