Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grain yield was higher under reduced tillage (RT, 3.23 Mg/ha) than under no-tillage (NT, 3.06 Mg/ha).

A claim from Tillage and Urea Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer Rate and Placement Affects Winter Wheat following Grain Sorghum and Soybean · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was higher under reduced tillage (RT, 3.23 Mg/ha) than under no-tillage (NT, 3.06 Mg/ha).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
RTe3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
3.23 Mg ha −1e3
Comparator
NTe3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–65
e3

“Tillage effects on grain yield were smaller than other treatment factors, averaging 3.23 Mg ha −1 for RT and 3.06 Mg ha −1 for NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1128

Title

Tillage and Urea Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer Rate and Placement Affects Winter Wheat following Grain Sorghum and Soybean

K. W. Kelley; D. W. Sweeney Agronomy Journal 2005. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0156

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d9af2b4d68167178dcf47b73cf3ec91ff895b4f02de05562ad017bc9b3901b89 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.