Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flat bed with 5.0 t/ha crop residue gave 116.9 kg/m3 water productivity.

A claim from Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as influenced by moisture management and zinc fortification in pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) chickpea cropping system under limited moisture conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat bed with 5.0 t/ha crop residue gave 116.9 kg/m3 water productivity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
flat bed with 5.0 t/ha crop residuee0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
116.9 kg/m3e0
Comparator
flat bed without residue and flat bed with 2.5 t/ha crop residuee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of 116.9 kg/m3 were observed under flat bed with 5.0 t/ha crop residue over flat bed without residue and flat bed with 2.5 t/ha crop residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1018
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–311

Title

Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as influenced by moisture management and zinc fortification in pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) chickpea cropping system under limited moisture conditions

G.L. CHOUDHARY; K.S. RANA; D.S. RANA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i4.4582

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-db0fb1daffb0f7ea9d150ccc8b91fcb43d1b4c56e097624c8306663ad966dda5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

organic · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.