Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Narrow bed and furrow with 2.5 t/ha crop residue increased production efficiency.

A claim from Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as influenced by moisture management and zinc fortification in pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) chickpea cropping system under limited moisture conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow bed and furrow with 2.5 t/ha crop residue increased production efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Narrow bed and furrow with 2.5 t/ha crop residue covere0
Outcome
production efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Narrow bed and furrow with 2.5 t/ha crop residue cover fetched significantly higher production efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1125
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–311

Title

Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) as influenced by moisture management and zinc fortification in pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) chickpea cropping system under limited moisture conditions

G.L. CHOUDHARY; K.S. RANA; D.S. RANA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i4.4582

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-77e201a962bb5f3ed2c73ce3805a22cd1c539014747540220b00794e58d124ff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

115 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

organic · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.