Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher nitrogen significantly improved protein quality in irrigated treatments during the second season.

A claim from Site‐specific effects of variable water supply and nitrogen fertilisation on winter wheat · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen significantly improved protein quality in irrigated treatments during the second season.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher N applicatione0
Outcome
protein qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
second season in the irrigated treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89
e0

“With respect to the higher N application at sites of high plant available soil water capacity, although the already high yield levels were not increased further, the protein quality was significantly improved in the first season within all treatments and in the second season in the irrigated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1462

Title

Site‐specific effects of variable water supply and nitrogen fertilisation on winter wheat

Dieter Geesing; Mariangela Diacono; Urs Schmidhalter Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2014. doi:10.1002/jpln.201300215

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-dbec701f24a5cc2bcb9f0d132df6117c8726fdc07c1683019bfc752f6ccff018 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this claim · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

445 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.